By: Rachid Nfinif
In this title, two opposing
concepts take place in the same context, philosophy as a rational activity
distinguished by reason, relativity, skepticism, and criticism. On the other
side, religion represents certainty, conviction, and absolutism. But philosophy is an intellectual adventure
which attempts to understand the
world and the man who lives in it , because the task of philosophy is
especially to contemplate the human condition. According to Hegel, religion is
a manifestation of spirit, exactly like arts and philosophy; no doubt, there is
a strong connection between philosophy and religion, throughout history since
the middle age. The aim of this article is not to determine the relation
between philosophy and religion, but rather to try to answer the
following question: what is a philosophy
of religion?
It is difficult to distinguish
the philosophy of religion. Generally, it is philosophizing about religion;
therefore, it is now a very flourishing branch of philosophy, which makes
intelligibility to religious concepts, like God, eternity, evil, miracle, and
death and so on. Philosophy of religion clarifies the relationship between these
concepts and real life and tries to understand the manner which affects the
individual and collective thinking. Philosophy of religion is not a comparative
study; it is distinguished from many disciplines related to religion, such as
sociology of religion, comparative history of religion, neuroethology, and
theology. Subsequently, the philosophy of religion is a critic of religious
discourse, and a task to understand the religious return in the contemporary
world today.
Philosophy of religion first appeared at the end of the eighteenth century, with Kant’s disciple Von Storchenan
1731 – 1798, who wrote a
book of seven volumes
entitled: "Philosophy of Religion" in 1772; a new branch of
philosophy studying all religions as one, and examinating theological evidence. The true beginning of philosophy of religion
was the complicated question of Enlightenment, as formed in the famous article of Kant: "What is Enlightenment?" It is
simply an exposition of the confrontation of reasoning and belief that exists among followers of different religions; it is also an attempt to get
out of church tutelage. This proclamation of emancipation is a reason
for standing against all forms of conviction and superstition.
All modern times was interested in
religion, but many philosophers return to think about it, in the contemporary
time, then the philosophy of religion come to light with famous names, like
Michel Foucault, Jacque Derrida, Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Lévinas, Richard rorty,
Gianni Vattimo, and after this, William James, Bertrand Russell, and others.
Intel now, we can find voices like Michel Maffesoli, in France, and Charles
Taylor in Canada. Standing behind This kind of philosophy a question about the
rationality of religious beliefs, and the assumption that these beliefs can be
discussed on an intellectual level; it is not a justification of religious
concepts at the bar of reason. Philosophy of religion in contemporary thought represents
an interruption with the Enlightenment tradition because of it interested in
religion as a substantial element in human being stricture; a French
philosopher and sociologist René Girard, for example, confirm the impossibility
of the existence of society without religion; man would believe in something,
he invented his convictions. The contemporary philosophers achieved
reconciliation with religion, and accept to think about it.
Every speech about the philosophy
of religion refers to hermeneutics, because of all intellectual effort of the
contemporary philosophers are reduced in the debate on the interpretation of
religious texts, and researching meaningful lectures of the religious presence
in the postmodern societies, in the post secularized world. Michel Maffesoli
takes about a secular religion, as such it is manifested in the football club
fan's behavior, submitting to the same mechanism guiding the believer's
behavior; the same collective ritual act, same holiness, and intolerance,
although they happen in different domains. According to René Girard, the
modernity is an extension of Christianity, it announces the death of god
crucified, but it keeps the same logic of victim; which take a new form,
focused on the weakness of woman, children, minorities, and animals, rather
then the weakness of Christ; against the Nietzschean idiom about the death of God,
jean luck Marion formed a new idiom about the death of death of God, therefore
many philosophers confirm the separation of religion and modernity, as Hans Blumenberg.
But many others clutch to the connection relationship between religion and
modernity, like the German philosopher, Carl Schmitt, who confirms that
modernity is just the secularization of a religious concept. Anyway, religion
keeps its place in our world, and we would think about it.
…/…
Very nice article👍
ردحذفthank you
ردحذف